ArxactaAI COMPLIANCE

Complex questions.
Defensible decisions.

Structured regulatory assessments bring the right evidence, responsible experts and documented reasoning together at the moment decisions are made.

0101Establish scope

Begin with the actual AI system, use case, operator role and regulatory question.

0202Evaluate impact

Work through the appropriate classification, transparency or risk criteria.

0303Capture approval

Route findings and determinations through recorded expert review.

0404Retain the record

Keep decisions, supporting evidence and versions available for future review.

ASSESSREVIEWAPPROVEPRESERVE

A decision process designed
to stand behind.

Bring legal requirements, current system context, responsible reviewers and supporting documents into the same controlled record.

STRUCTURED DECISIONS / ACCOUNTABLE REVIEWS

The right review for the right use.

arxacta supports the assessments that emerge from an organization's actual legal responsibilities, rather than treating every AI deployment as an identical checklist.

AI Act classification

Determine relevant risk and operator requirements.

Fundamental rights impact

Coordinate required assessments and expert reviews.

Transparency and disclosure

Review the circumstances, notices and supporting implementation records.

Privacy and supplier screening

Keep related regulatory and supplier assessments connected.

CLASSIFICATION REVIEWIn review
ASSESSMENT

Customer Support Agent

Legal scope and intended-use evaluation

REGULATORY QUESTIONWhich requirements apply to this deployment?

Determination grounded in legal source, operator context and use case.

PO
Product ownerSystem context supplied
✓
LC
Legal & complianceDetermination review
↗

Review the change.
Preserve the original.

When a system changes purpose, supplier or operating context, arxacta can connect that change to the relevant assessment and establish a new review while retaining prior determinations and approvals.

Explore the decision history

Bring rigor to every regulatory assessment.

Coordinate complex evaluations and retain the reasoning, reviewers and evidence behind each conclusion.